<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Category Winner: Tech + Shopping</title>
	<link>http://www.wrevenue.com/2007/10/22/the-category-winner-tech-shopping/</link>
	<description>Double Your Site's Revenue - Scott Wainner on Web Business</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 22:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: www.bestplasmatvdeals.info &#187; The Category Winner: Tech + Shopping</title>
		<link>http://www.wrevenue.com/2007/10/22/the-category-winner-tech-shopping/#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>www.bestplasmatvdeals.info &#187; The Category Winner: Tech + Shopping</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 22:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.wrevenue.com/2007/10/22/the-category-winner-tech-shopping/#comment-225</guid>
		<description>[...] Scott put an intriguing blog post on The Category Winner: Tech + Shopping.Here&#8217;s a quick excerpt:A site about cars is cool, but it is going to attract a whole different advertiser than a site about finding bargains on Plasma TV’s. And the thing is, advertisers are paying more money to reach tech oriented shoppers than to reach &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Scott put an intriguing blog post on The Category Winner: Tech + Shopping.Here&#8217;s a quick excerpt:A site about cars is cool, but it is going to attract a whole different advertiser than a site about finding bargains on Plasma TV’s. And the thing is, advertisers are paying more money to reach tech oriented shoppers than to reach &#8230; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.wrevenue.com/2007/10/22/the-category-winner-tech-shopping/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 20:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.wrevenue.com/2007/10/22/the-category-winner-tech-shopping/#comment-224</guid>
		<description>Oh and I'll add: if you're relying 100% on affiliate sales, meaning, you don't get paid until someone buys something, then you're really missing the boat.  Getting paid when a person clicks on an ad will earn you far more money than earning 5% of what people actually end up buying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and I&#8217;ll add: if you&#8217;re relying 100% on affiliate sales, meaning, you don&#8217;t get paid until someone buys something, then you&#8217;re really missing the boat.  Getting paid when a person clicks on an ad will earn you far more money than earning 5% of what people actually end up buying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.wrevenue.com/2007/10/22/the-category-winner-tech-shopping/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 20:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.wrevenue.com/2007/10/22/the-category-winner-tech-shopping/#comment-223</guid>
		<description>"Erm, tech + shopping is the big winner?
Clothing and accessories now out-sell tech products online …and there’s far less competition! ;)"

I think you're missing the point.  I'm not in the business of selling stuff.  I'm in the business of making money from advertising.  Clothing ads pay squat.  The fact remains: when you stick an ad on your clothing site, you're going to get $0.05/click.  When you stick an ad on your Plasma TV bargain site, you're going to get $1.00/click.  You can decide which is better.

Also, more competition in a category is better for publishers because it drives up the CPC.  The more advertisers competing to advertise, the more they have to pay per click.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Erm, tech + shopping is the big winner?<br />
Clothing and accessories now out-sell tech products online …and there’s far less competition! ;)&#8221;</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re missing the point.  I&#8217;m not in the business of selling stuff.  I&#8217;m in the business of making money from advertising.  Clothing ads pay squat.  The fact remains: when you stick an ad on your clothing site, you&#8217;re going to get $0.05/click.  When you stick an ad on your Plasma TV bargain site, you&#8217;re going to get $1.00/click.  You can decide which is better.</p>
<p>Also, more competition in a category is better for publishers because it drives up the CPC.  The more advertisers competing to advertise, the more they have to pay per click.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forum Business Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.wrevenue.com/2007/10/22/the-category-winner-tech-shopping/#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator>Forum Business Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 19:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.wrevenue.com/2007/10/22/the-category-winner-tech-shopping/#comment-221</guid>
		<description>very cool post. I just came here from a review I read. I like your blog so far!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very cool post. I just came here from a review I read. I like your blog so far!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chipseo</title>
		<link>http://www.wrevenue.com/2007/10/22/the-category-winner-tech-shopping/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>chipseo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 14:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.wrevenue.com/2007/10/22/the-category-winner-tech-shopping/#comment-215</guid>
		<description>Thanks for a great list and a detailed post.  You always give so much detail and provide a lot to think about, thanks.  Scott

p.s. there are a lot of us Scott's around the Internet huh :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for a great list and a detailed post.  You always give so much detail and provide a lot to think about, thanks.  Scott</p>
<p>p.s. there are a lot of us Scott&#8217;s around the Internet huh <img src='http://www.wrevenue.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qzcomplete &#187; The Category Winner: Tech + Shopping</title>
		<link>http://www.wrevenue.com/2007/10/22/the-category-winner-tech-shopping/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>qzcomplete &#187; The Category Winner: Tech + Shopping</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 13:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.wrevenue.com/2007/10/22/the-category-winner-tech-shopping/#comment-213</guid>
		<description>[...] read more here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] read more here [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sara from The Bargain Queen</title>
		<link>http://www.wrevenue.com/2007/10/22/the-category-winner-tech-shopping/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>Sara from The Bargain Queen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.wrevenue.com/2007/10/22/the-category-winner-tech-shopping/#comment-210</guid>
		<description>Erm, tech + shopping is the big winner?

Clothing and accessories now out-sell tech products online:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/14/technology/14clothing.html?_r=1&#38;ref=business&#38;oref=slogin

...and there's far less competition! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erm, tech + shopping is the big winner?</p>
<p>Clothing and accessories now out-sell tech products online:<br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/14/technology/14clothing.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business&amp;oref=slogin" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/14/technology/14clothing.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business&amp;oref=slogin</a></p>
<p>&#8230;and there&#8217;s far less competition! <img src='http://www.wrevenue.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doobi &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Category Winner: Tech + Shopping</title>
		<link>http://www.wrevenue.com/2007/10/22/the-category-winner-tech-shopping/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>doobi &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Category Winner: Tech + Shopping</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 09:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.wrevenue.com/2007/10/22/the-category-winner-tech-shopping/#comment-206</guid>
		<description>[...] more here  This entry was posted on Monday, October 22nd, 2007 at 2:44 am and is filed under cool sites. You [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] more here  This entry was posted on Monday, October 22nd, 2007 at 2:44 am and is filed under cool sites. You [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Category Winner: Tech + Shopping</title>
		<link>http://www.wrevenue.com/2007/10/22/the-category-winner-tech-shopping/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>The Category Winner: Tech + Shopping</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 08:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.wrevenue.com/2007/10/22/the-category-winner-tech-shopping/#comment-205</guid>
		<description>[...] post by Scott and software by Elliott [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] post by Scott and software by Elliott [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vince - reviewbay.com</title>
		<link>http://www.wrevenue.com/2007/10/22/the-category-winner-tech-shopping/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>vince - reviewbay.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 08:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.wrevenue.com/2007/10/22/the-category-winner-tech-shopping/#comment-204</guid>
		<description>Thank you Scott. 
I've been using the networks you mentioned, and I think it's time for me to research and consider using shopping's API directly as an alternative.

Thanks as always for your informative posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Scott.<br />
I&#8217;ve been using the networks you mentioned, and I think it&#8217;s time for me to research and consider using shopping&#8217;s API directly as an alternative.</p>
<p>Thanks as always for your informative posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
