Blodget: We Remember Your Biased Bubble Advice

Posted by Scott on 16th November, 2007 |    6 comments

Remember Henry Blodget, the Merrill Lynch analyst who pumped up stocks in 2000 that he knew were terrible investments, in order to benefit himself and Merrill? He was sued by the SEC and paid $4M for his antics and banned from Wall Street for life in 2003, but since then he has been trying to weasel his way back into the exact same game using the Internet to carry his voice.

In 2003, the SEC alledged:

“Blodget aided and abetted Merrill Lynch’s fraudulent research on GoTo.com. Further, Merrill Lynch and Blodget published research on five other companies [24/7 Media, Inc.; LifeMinders, Inc.; Homestore.com, Inc.; Excite@Home; and Internet Capital Group, Inc.] that were not based on principles of fair dealing and good faith and did not provide a sound basis for evaluating facts, contained exaggerated or unwarranted claims, and/or contained opinions for which there was no reasonable basis.”

Despite all that, just this evening, a local ABC7 News affiliate reported that “a securities analyst, Henry Blodget, thinks Microsoft should buy Yahoo”. Hello?! Where is the disclosure that “analyst” Blodget was tossed out of Wall Street in 2003 for his biased and unethical recommendations at that time? Why are we listening to him again? The mainstream media is giving him a red carpet to pick up right from where he left off, fueling hype, affecting stock prices, all the while still being banned from Wall Street by the SEC. Now, Blodget is even being credited with causing Yahoo’s stock to jump 7 percent:

NEW YORK (Reuters) November 16, 2007 - Yahoo Inc (YHOO.O) shares rose nearly 7 percent on Friday on renewed speculation, sparked by former Wall Street analyst Henry Blodget that the Internet company could be a takeover target for Microsoft Corp (MSFT.O).

In case you didn’t get burned by Blodget’s advice in 2000, or have since forgotten, let’s review:

-In the summer of 2000, while he publicly pumped up the stock of InfoSpace, a company that was Interested in buying Merrill Lynch client Go2Net, in private emails Blodget admitted that he thought InfoSpace was a “piece of junk”.

-In September 2000, Blodget recommended LifeMinders (LFMN), and it was at $22 when he initiated coverage. Three months later it hit $3, but Blodget continued to recommend it because Merrill sought an investment banking relationship with LFMN. In regards to this, Blodget wrote to a colleague, “shame on me”.

-Blodget never once issued a “sell” recommendation on any Internet stock.

-A Manhattan lawyer won a $400,000 settlement from Merrill after arguing that Blodget’s advice was biased since he failed to disclose his conflict of interest.

-Blodget graduated from Yale with a major in history and no training in finance.

All this guy did was to jump on the dot com bubble bandwagon, say “buy buy buy” for stocks that he knew were junk and that his company had a vested interest in. That didn’t require a lick of talent, and his recommendations were in fact totally self serving and the advice he gave was completely opposite to the advice even he knew he should be giving. His two faced handling of stock recommendations coupled with the SEC ban means that no one should be taking any kind of financial advice from this guy ever. But here he is, back in the limelight, because the mainstream media is putting him there.

Who else did the mainstream media trust recently, only to turn out that they were totally incompetent? Right, none other than highly respected talk show host Oprah touted plastic surgeon Dr. Jan Adams as the next best thing since sliced bread. The Discovery Channel even gave him his own show. Too bad it turned out that he wasn’t board certified, has at least two alcohol related criminal convictions, has settled at least two malpractice suits, is being sued this week for leaving a giant sponge inside a patient, and operated on Kanye West’s mother the day before she died. Thankfully, Discovery has yanked his show in a reactionary move, but perhaps these media sources should have done their homework before touting Dr. Adams as such a great surgeon.

Wake up mainstream media: do your homework before quoting or trusting people as “experts”, and don’t think that just because a few years have gone by, a person has changed or should now be trusted. Accepting Blodget’s financial advice back into mainstream media is a collosal error in judgment. Today it’s “MSFT should buy YHOO”, tomorrow it’s “everyone go buy Pets.com and Webvan”. And if people don’t know anything about Blodget’s past, then they’ll listen to and act on that advice because it’s being relayed to them by reputable mainstream sources.

Popularity: 20%

Friday, November 16th, 2007 at 10:46 pm and is filed under Web Business. If you like this post why not subscribe to my full text RSS feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

RSS feed | Trackback URI

6 Comments »

2007-11-17 01:05:30

[…] You can read the rest of this blog post by going to the original source, here […]

 
Comment by ScreenRant.com
2007-11-17 13:17:30

Sigh… mainstream media is the absolute worst. You’re right, how in the heck could they leave something as significant as this guy’s past out of their report??

You absolutely cannot trust ANYTHING you see on the news anymore.

Thanks for that,

Vic

 
2007-11-21 01:39:10

[…] couldn’t resist posting this one.  I posted a few days ago about how Henry Blodget, the  analyst banned from Wall Street by the SEC in 2003, is trying to weasel his way back into […]

 
Trackback by relationship
2007-12-03 02:25:39

relationship

relationship

 
Comment by Steven
2007-12-10 11:06:09

I know an idiot that recently bought yahoo stocks thinking it would go up due to numerous reasons including the whole china spill… Since then, All I can see is the stock plummeting and still is. By the looks of it, it will continue to do so LOL

 
Comment by dedeoutsith
2008-10-13 03:22:45

First-time investor

“I want to invest, but I dont know where and how to start. Help me choose the best funds with quick returns.
- Jane Mozingo, Chicago

If you are looking for -quick returns-, then mutual funds are not the investment to make. I don’t know what’s the investment to make, but let me stick to what I know, which is mutual funds
The rationale for equities established, let’s put in place some ground rules for you as a first-time investor:

-Not all your savings should go into equities. Consult your financial planner on how much should.
- Take the help of a good investment advisor, again with a good track record. If you want to do it yourself, go through performance rankings of independent fund-tracking agencies like SOIC , and pick funds that have consistently done well.
-About 60-65 per cent of your investment should be in funds with a large-cap bias, 25-35 per cent with a mid-cap objective, the balance in theme funds.
-Spread your risk. Don’t put all your money in just one scheme. Instead, for each objective of yours, divide your investment across three schemes, across three fund houses. That way, even if one scheme stumbles because of bad money management, the others give you a chance to make up.
-Track your schemes periodically to make sure they stay performers. Earning returns and preserving your capital is as tough, if not tougher, than earning it.

Matthew Barry, “Seven Oceans Investments Club”.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Subscribe to comments via email
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong> in your comment.
  • links

  • recent readers

Join Community

  • my businesses

Copyright 2007 All Enthusiast, Inc. All Rights Reserved